|

Page
back to page one . . .
-- OR --
Mr.
Frankland, elderly legal enthusiast whom you can also
find in his own digs at Lafter
Hall, can also be seen in these previous issues of Electro-Graphic
Monthly courtesy of his literary agent David Richardson:
January
2004 . . .
Mr. Frankland's Letter of Introduction
|
A
Letter From Mr. Frankland
Regarding Dr. Watson
Lafter
Hall
Devonshire
November 1917
To Friends
of The Dark Lantern League
As you may
recall, Dr Watson explained in his introductory letter how I came
to write to him after the publication of "His Last Bow,"
but he glossed over (or perhaps was unaware of) my initial communication
with the Strand Magazine which involved him. I reproduce it below
so that you may, in fairness, see that there are some outstanding
issues between us. I received no reply from Mr. Smith but did not
pursue the matter further as I found that simply my mention ---
unflattering and inaccurate though it was --- in his tale of our
Dartmoor Hound Sir Henry dislikes being reminded of it, so
we refer to it that way --- surprisingly brought me some measure
of local fame. Even the Fernworthy folk seemed more kindly disposed
toward me, so I suppose I derived some benefit from it.
Respectfully
yours
Mr Frankland
_________________________________
Lafter Hall
Devonshire
January 1902
Mr. H. Greenhough
Smith, Literary Editor
The Strand Magazine
359 Burleigh Street
London, WC
Dear Mr Smith
I write in
protest against the gross misrepresentations of myself and my daughter
which have been made in the latest episode of Dr. Watson's attempt
to relate the events which transpired on Dartmoor some thirteen
years ago. (I am aware that you are printing them under another
person's name, but Dr. Watson's authorship is clear for all who
have eyes to see.)
I did not
object to his initial description of me --- I fancy I can turn a
phrase as well as the next man --- although we had only met the
one time by then, and so his characterization was a bit in front
of his knowledge. But what he has said in this episode is so much
a distortion of the actual events, and is so much a slur upon my
daughter, that I cannot let it pass in silence.
It is true
that at the time we were somewhat estranged, and as I learned later
somewhat under the invidious influence of the rogue Stapleton (and
I must confess I was myself somewhat taken in by the man's smooth
talk and interest in the Moor). But his description of my daughter
as having 'a coursness' in her appearance verges on the actionable,
and you may be hearing from my soliciter if you publish any further
slurs upon her.
As to his
accuracy as a reporter one has to laugh. The man apparently took
my very ordinary terrestrial telescope for an astronomical one,
and did not realize that there is a difference. I have an interest
in astronomy, as any educated man in these times will have, but
Dartmoor is a singularly bad location from which to observe the
skies --- it rains a great deal here -- and I have had to be content
with reading about other people's observations, rather than making
my own.
I did as it
happens win two lawsuits that day he passed by, but had I known
what he was going to write about my daughter I can assure you I
would never have invited him into my house to share a glass of wine
--- and we only shared the one --- his implication that I wished
to down the bottle with him is quite false, as are the scurrilous
remarks about the local police that he attributes to me. I suspect
that these derive from his own experience with them, for he was
seen here as something of a busybody, forever poking his nose into
things --- not that there was not reason to inquire, but really,
one would have thought he had been sent from God himself for the
airs he gave himself.
I cannot,
of course, prevent you from publishing more of this man's tripe
--- it sounds like he is going to make a whole book of our local
tragedy --- but I wish to express in the strongest terms the total
misrepresentation of the characters of myself and my daughter which
are given in it.
I am
Mr. Frankland
|