| |
The
Shocking Sercret of the
Sixth Bust of Napoleon
Tuesday last, I think it was, when I found myself -- quite
by accident, you understand -- smoking my old cherrywood. Call me Canonically
suggestible, if you will, but my cherrywood pipe infallibly puts me in
a disputatious mood. Watson tells us that Holmes smoked his cherrywood
when in a disputatious mood, but from my own experience I can't help but
wonder ifi the opposite weren't true. The pipe, by whatever combination
of oils and wood grain, put Holmes in that mood, no matter what his previous
attitude. Holmes did not smoke his cherrywood when in disputatious mood;
Holmes was just in a disputatious mood when he smoked his cherrywood.
Make sense? Well, suffice it to say that last Tuesday I was feeling feisty.
As my mind roamed the countryside of memory, looking to pic a fight,
I stumbled across a paper by Bill Cochran that was read at a meeting of
the Occupants of the Empty House last fall -- something Bill had entitled
"The Ragged Napoleons." In this paper, the good Cochran deduced
that the six busts of Napoleon in SIXN represented Watson's three wives
-- two busts for each wife Aha, I thought, here is something I can dispute.
A bust, as I have always understood it, usually comes one per woman.
A quick check of my trusty World Famous Chambers Etymological English
Dictionary backs me up on this point, defining "bust ' as "the
upper part ot a human body, esp. a woman's." Unless Watson married
three sets of Siamese twins, this means the six busts meant six wives.
And why do they have to be Watson's wives, anyway?
Six busts of Napoleon -- doesn't that suggest something to you? Six women
belonging to Napoleon. If Watson is using some sort code name here, let
us look to where he's used the name "Napoleon" before. And that
brings us to "The Napoleon of Crime," Professor James Moriarty.
The Napoleon of Crime would be a man certain to have six women, if not
for his own personal harem, at least as a stable of prostitutes in some
branch of his operations.
Suddenly, the active mind can see dark parallels arising from the simple
phrase "six busts of Napoleon."
Think about the story SIXN for a moment. Six plaster figures, one of
which had had the Borgia pearl inserted into it. One by one, five of the
six figures were destroyed by a desperate knife-wielding criminal, searching
for the pearl. Scotland Yard was baffled by this criminal, whose sole
drive seemed to be a hatred of busts of Napoleon. "Busts of Napoleon,"
or prostitutes in the service of Moriarty? You will remember, of course,
that Scotland Yard was baffled in the late 1880s by a criminal whose sole
motive seemed to be a hatred of prostitutes -- Jack the Ripper.
He destroyed five Prostitutes (and destroyed is the perfect word for
what he did to them) before the end of his killing. Looking for the Borgia
pearl, perhaps? The details of SIXN/Jack the Ripper parallel are a bit
too sordid to go into in a family publication, as this most certainly
is, but those readers already familiar with the Ripper killings can reach
the necessary conclusions on their own.
The only point that still needs to be made, however, is the classic:
"If Holmes caught Jack the Ripper, why didn't Watson or he newspapers
write it up? Why were the facts kept secret?" A SIXN/Jack parallel
readily gives us the answer to that question if we follow the story to
its finish: Five busts of Napoleon ere stolen and destroyed in the search
for the pearl. Following he criminal's capture, the final bust of Napoleon
and the rights to seek any pearl secreted within it were purchased by
Sherlock Holmes, who then retrieved the pearl.
Sure, it was the crime of the century. Sure, it was the greatest triumph
of Sherlock Holmes's career. But do you think for instant that either
event would be enough to cause a stalwart Victorian and loyal friend like
Dr. Watson to write about how Sherlock Holmes came to hire a prostitute
one night and the business that followed?
Of course not, but then, Watson also wouldn't have written up the business
which followed his marriage to three sets of Siamese twins. He just wrote
SIXN. Make of it what you will.
(Printed in Plugs & Dottles, January
1990 )
|
|