|

Page
back to page one . . .
-- OR --
Mr.
John Clay, whose blood runs a royal red, can also be
seen in these previous issues of Electro-Graphic Monthly courtesy
of her literary agent David McAllister:
January
2004 . . .
His letter of introduction
February
2004 . . .
Regarding Beggars
March
2004 . . .
Regarding John Clay's Reputation
|
A
Letter From Mr. John Clay
Regarding Non-English Liasons
Dear fellow members of
the DDL,
This business of liasons
with non-Englishmen is very troubling. I have to admit to some bias
regarding the institution of marriage in the first place. I hold
that the natural result of intimacy between man and woman does not
need the blessings of either church or state to benefit from the
heriditary expectations due, but is itself proof of the union. Homo
ipsa loquitur don't you know. That said, I am of the general opinion
that Englishmen and women should stick with our own kind. Now, I'm
all for as much investment in English bloodlines as possible. But,
look what can happen. These foreigners, and they know who they are,
like to come here and interfer with their own ideas. I am not just
talking about the Yankee women who marry dukes and such; their dollars
are not unwelcome. You'd think they'd be just as interested in real
ducal bloodlines, but I can't get a tumble just because I'm not
on the debutants' mamas' A-list. Nor am I opposed to Englishmen
marrying South American heiresses and importing their millions,
either. Mostly I'm against any export of our capital (both of pulcritude
and pelf) such as that delightful DeMerville girl and Baron (if
he is a Baron) Gruner. I say, I may have an "acid splash"
in my forelock, but Adelbert is just beyond the Pale. Nice china,
though; and don't turn down an invite to see his "etchings".
J.Clay,
Esq.
|